Do LLMs Understand Ambiguity in Text? A Case Study in Open-world Question Answering
원문 초록
Ambiguity in natural language poses significant challenges to Large Language Models (LLMs) used for open-domain question answering. LLMs often struggle with the inherent uncertainties of human communication, leading to misinterpretations, miscommunications, hallucinations, and biased responses. This significantly weakens their ability to be used for tasks like fact-checking, question answering, feature extraction, and sentiment analysis. Using open-domain question answering as a test case, we compare off-the-shelf and few-shot LLM performance, focusing on measuring the impact of explicit disambiguation strategies. We demonstrate how simple, training-free, token-level disambiguation methods may be effectively used to improve LLM performance for ambiguous question answering tasks. We empirically show our findings and discuss best practices and broader impacts regarding ambiguity in LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
TableRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Heterogeneous Document Reasoning
ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAG
GenKI: Enhancing Open-Domain Question Answering with Knowledge Integration and Controllable Generation in Large Language Models
Efficient Context Selection for Long-Context QA: No Tuning, No Iteration, Just Adaptive-$k$
Improving Reliability and Explainability of Medical Question Answering through Atomic Fact Checking in Retrieval-Augmented LLMs
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.