Automatic Discovery and Assessment of Interpretable Systematic Errors in Semantic Segmentation
원문 초록
This paper presents a novel method for discovering systematic errors in segmentation models. For instance, a systematic error in the segmentation model can be a sufficiently large number of misclassifications from the model as a parking meter for a target class of pedestrians. With the rapid deployment of these models in critical applications such as autonomous driving, it is vital to detect and interpret these systematic errors. However, the key challenge is automatically discovering such failures on unlabelled data and forming interpretable semantic sub-groups for intervention. For this, we leverage multimodal foundation models to retrieve errors and use conceptual linkage along with erroneous nature to study the systematic nature of these errors. We demonstrate that such errors are present in SOTA segmentation models (UperNet ConvNeXt and UperNet Swin) trained on the Berkeley Deep Drive and benchmark the approach qualitatively and quantitatively, showing its effectiveness by discovering coherent systematic errors for these models. Our work opens up the avenue to model analysis and intervention that have so far been underexplored in semantic segmentation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
NRSeg: Noise-Resilient Learning for BEV Semantic Segmentation via Driving World Models
A Convolutional Neural Network for Point Cloud Instance Segmentation in Cluttered Scene Trained by Synthetic Data Without Color
Alleviating Textual Reliance in Medical Language-guided Segmentation via Prototype-driven Semantic Approximation
A New Dataset and Performance Benchmark for Real-time Spacecraft Segmentation in Onboard Flight Computers
RSRefSeg 2: Decoupling Referring Remote Sensing Image Segmentation with Foundation Models
Beyond One Shot, Beyond One Perspective: Cross-View and Long-Horizon Distillation for Better LiDAR Representations
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.