Evaluating Creativity and Deception in Large Language Models: A Simulation Framework for Multi-Agent Balderdash
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in complex tasks and interactive environments, yet their creativity remains underexplored. This paper introduces a simulation framework utilizing the game Balderdash to evaluate both the creativity and logical reasoning of LLMs. In Balderdash, players generate fictitious definitions for obscure terms to deceive others while identifying correct definitions. Our framework enables multiple LLM agents to participate in this game, assessing their ability to produce plausible definitions and strategize based on game rules and history. We implemented a centralized game engine featuring various LLMs as participants and a judge LLM to evaluate semantic equivalence. Through a series of experiments, we analyzed the performance of different LLMs, examining metrics such as True Definition Ratio, Deception Ratio, and Correct Guess Ratio. The results provide insights into the creative and deceptive capabilities of LLMs, highlighting their strengths and areas for improvement. Specifically, the study reveals that infrequent vocabulary in LLMs' input leads to poor reasoning on game rules and historical context (https://github.com/ParsaHejabi/Simulation-Framework-for-Multi-Agent-Balderdash).
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models
EviNet: Evidential Reasoning Network for Resilient Graph Learning in the Open and Noisy Environments
Are LLMs Reliable Translators of Logical Reasoning Across Lexically Diversified Contexts?
Dissecting Logical Reasoning in LLMs: A Fine-Grained Evaluation and Supervision Study
Climate Finance Bench
SV-TrustEval-C: Evaluating Structure and Semantic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Source Code Vulnerability Analysis
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.