Can adversarial attacks by large language models be attributed?
원문 초록
Attributing outputs from Large Language Models (LLMs) in adversarial settings-such as cyberattacks and disinformation-presents significant challenges that are likely to grow in importance. We investigate this attribution problem using formal language theory, specifically language identification in the limit as introduced by Gold and extended by Angluin. By modeling LLM outputs as formal languages, we analyze whether finite text samples can uniquely pinpoint the originating model. Our results show that due to the non-identifiability of certain language classes, under some mild assumptions about overlapping outputs from fine-tuned models it is theoretically impossible to attribute outputs to specific LLMs with certainty. This holds also when accounting for expressivity limitations of Transformer architectures. Even with direct model access or comprehensive monitoring, significant computational hurdles impede attribution efforts. These findings highlight an urgent need for proactive measures to mitigate risks posed by adversarial LLM use as their influence continues to expand.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Token Masking Improves Transformer-Based Text Classification
Attributes Shape the Embedding Space of Face Recognition Models
Ref-Long: Benchmarking the Long-context Referencing Capability of Long-context Language Models
Emergent Semantics Beyond Token Embeddings: Transformer LMs with Frozen Visual Unicode Representations
MambaFusion: Height-Fidelity Dense Global Fusion for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection
The Trilemma of Truth in Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.