Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration
원문 초록
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly influence decision-making across various fields, the need to attribute responsibility for undesirable outcomes has become essential, though complicated by the complex interplay between humans and AI. Existing attribution methods based on actual causality and Shapley values tend to disproportionately blame agents who contribute more to an outcome and rely on real-world measures of blameworthiness that may misalign with responsible AI standards. This paper presents a causal framework using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to systematically attribute responsibility in human-AI systems, measuring overall blameworthiness while employing counterfactual reasoning to account for agents' expected epistemic levels. Two case studies illustrate the framework's adaptability in diverse human-AI collaboration scenarios.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Diffusion Counterfactual Generation with Semantic Abduction
Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence
Turning Sand to Gold: Recycling Data to Bridge On-Policy and Off-Policy Learning via Causal Bound
Active Inference AI Systems for Scientific Discovery
HalluSegBench: Counterfactual Visual Reasoning for Segmentation Hallucination Evaluation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.