Diagnosing Medical Datasets with Training Dynamics
원문 초록
This study explores the potential of using training dynamics as an automated alternative to human annotation for evaluating the quality of training data. The framework used is Data Maps, which classifies data points into categories such as easy-to-learn, hard-to-learn, and ambiguous (Swayamdipta et al., 2020). Swayamdipta et al. (2020) highlight that difficult-to-learn examples often contain errors, and ambiguous cases significantly impact model training. To confirm the reliability of these findings, we replicated the experiments using a challenging dataset, with a focus on medical question answering. In addition to text comprehension, this field requires the acquisition of detailed medical knowledge, which further complicates the task. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted to assess the feasibility and transferability of the Data Maps framework to the medical domain. The evaluation indicates that the framework is unsuitable for addressing datasets' unique challenges in answering medical questions.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning
Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflection
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models
AMQA: An Adversarial Dataset for Benchmarking Bias of LLMs in Medicine and Healthcare
From RAG to Agentic: Validating Islamic-Medicine Responses with LLM Agents
Instruction Tuning and CoT Prompting for Contextual Medical QA with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.