How Effective Is Self-Consistency for Long-Context Problems?
원문 초록
Self-consistency (SC) has been demonstrated to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) across various tasks and domains involving short content. However, does this evidence support its effectiveness for long-context problems? This study examines the role of SC in long-context scenarios, where LLMs often struggle with position bias, hindering their ability to utilize information effectively from all parts of their long input context. We examine a range of design parameters, including different models, context lengths, prompt formats, and types of datasets and tasks. Our findings demonstrate that SC, while effective for short-context problems, fundamentally fails for long-context tasks -- not only does it fail to mitigate position bias, but it can also actively degrade performance. We observe that the effectiveness of SC varies with context length and model size but remains mainly unaffected by prompt format or task type. These results provide valuable insight into the limitations of current LLMs in long-context understanding and highlight the need for more sophisticated approaches to address position bias in these models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Ref-Long: Benchmarking the Long-context Referencing Capability of Long-context Language Models
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
Cache Me If You Can: How Many KVs Do You Need for Effective Long-Context LMs?
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems
JoFormer (Journey-based Transformer): Theory and Empirical Analysis on the Tiny Shakespeare Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.