Democratizing Reward Design for Personal and Representative Value-Alignment
원문 초록
Aligning AI agents with human values is challenging due to diverse and subjective notions of values. Standard alignment methods often aggregate crowd feedback, which can result in the suppression of unique or minority preferences. We introduce Interactive-Reflective Dialogue Alignment, a method that iteratively engages users in reflecting on and specifying their subjective value definitions. This system learns individual value definitions through language-model-based preference elicitation and constructs personalized reward models that can be used to align AI behaviour. We evaluated our system through two studies with 30 participants, one focusing on "respect" and the other on ethical decision-making in autonomous vehicles. Our findings demonstrate diverse definitions of value-aligned behaviour and show that our system can accurately capture each person's unique understanding. This approach enables personalized alignment and can inform more representative and interpretable collective alignment strategies.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Inaugural MOASEI Competition at AAMAS'2025: A Technical Report
Case-based Reasoning Augmented Large Language Model Framework for Decision Making in Realistic Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
Make Your AUV Adaptive: An Environment-Aware Reinforcement Learning Framework For Underwater Tasks
Hypothesis Testing for Quantifying LLM-Human Misalignment in Multiple Choice Settings
CFBenchmark-MM: Chinese Financial Assistant Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model
HOP+: History-enhanced and Order-aware Pre-training for Vision-and-Language Navigation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.