Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks
원문 초록
When dealing with right-censored data, where some outcomes are missing due to a limited observation period, survival analysis -- known as time-to-event analysis -- focuses on predicting the time until an event of interest occurs. Multiple classes of outcomes lead to a classification variant: predicting the most likely event, a less explored area known as competing risks. Classic competing risks models couple architecture and loss, limiting scalability.To address these issues, we design a strictly proper censoring-adjusted separable scoring rule, allowing optimization on a subset of the data as each observation is evaluated independently. The loss estimates outcome probabilities and enables stochastic optimization for competing risks, which we use for efficient gradient boosting trees. SurvivalBoost not only outperforms 12 state-of-the-art models across several metrics on 4 real-life datasets, both in competing risks and survival settings, but also provides great calibration, the ability to predict across any time horizon, and computation times faster than existing methods.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Teaching Models To Survive: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks
A Large-Scale Neutral Comparison Study of Survival Models on Low-Dimensional Data
h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objective
Enforcing tail calibration when training probabilistic forecast models
Survival Analysis as Imprecise Classification with Trainable Kernels
Adaptive Semantic Token Communication for Transformer-based Edge Inference
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.