Assessing the Performance of Human-Capable LLMs -- Are LLMs Coming for Your Job?
원문 초록
The current paper presents the development and validation of SelfScore, a novel benchmark designed to assess the performance of automated Large Language Model (LLM) agents on help desk and professional consultation tasks. Given the increasing integration of AI in industries, particularly within customer service, SelfScore fills a crucial gap by enabling the comparison of automated agents and human workers. The benchmark evaluates agents on problem complexity and response helpfulness, ensuring transparency and simplicity in its scoring system. The study also develops automated LLM agents to assess SelfScore and explores the benefits of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for domain-specific tasks, demonstrating that automated LLM agents incorporating RAG outperform those without. All automated LLM agents were observed to perform better than the human control group. Given these results, the study raises concerns about the potential displacement of human workers, especially in areas where AI technologies excel. Ultimately, SelfScore provides a foundational tool for understanding the impact of AI in help desk environments while advocating for ethical considerations in the ongoing transition towards automation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
XGraphRAG: Interactive Visual Analysis for Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation
LLM Web Dynamics: Tracing Model Collapse in a Network of LLMs
Lightweight Relevance Grader in RAG
RMIT-ADM+S at the SIGIR 2025 LiveRAG Challenge
Enterprise Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark
From RAG to Agentic: Validating Islamic-Medicine Responses with LLM Agents
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.