Which LLMs are Difficult to Detect? A Detailed Analysis of Potential Factors Contributing to Difficulties in LLM Text Detection
원문 초록
As LLMs increase in accessibility, LLM-generated texts have proliferated across several fields, such as scientific, academic, and creative writing. However, LLMs are not created equally; they may have different architectures and training datasets. Thus, some LLMs may be more challenging to detect than others. Using two datasets spanning four total writing domains, we train AI-generated (AIG) text classifiers using the LibAUC library - a deep learning library for training classifiers with imbalanced datasets. Our results in the Deepfake Text dataset show that AIG-text detection varies across domains, with scientific writing being relatively challenging. In the Rewritten Ivy Panda (RIP) dataset focusing on student essays, we find that the OpenAI family of LLMs was substantially difficult for our classifiers to distinguish from human texts. Additionally, we explore possible factors that could explain the difficulties in detecting OpenAI-generated texts.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectors
The Devil is in Fine-tuning and Long-tailed Problems:A New Benchmark for Scene Text Detection
FAID: Fine-grained AI-generated Text Detection using Multi-task Auxiliary and Multi-level Contrastive Learning
Visual Text Processing: A Comprehensive Review and Unified Evaluation
SemiETS: Integrating Spatial and Content Consistencies for Semi-Supervised End-to-end Text Spotting
Short-PHD: Detecting Short LLM-generated Text with Topological Data Analysis After Off-topic Content Insertion
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.