Breaking the Manual Annotation Bottleneck: Creating a Comprehensive Legal Case Criticality Dataset through Semi-Automated Labeling
원문 초록
Predicting case criticality helps legal professionals in the court system manage large volumes of case law. This paper introduces the Criticality Prediction dataset, a new resource for evaluating the potential influence of Swiss Federal Supreme Court decisions on future jurisprudence. Unlike existing approaches that rely on resource-intensive manual annotations, we semi-automatically derive labels leading to a much larger dataset than otherwise possible. Our dataset features a two-tier labeling system: (1) the LD-Label, which identifies cases published as Leading Decisions (LD), and (2) the Citation-Label, which ranks cases by their citation frequency and recency. This allows for a more nuanced evaluation of case importance. We evaluate several multilingual models, including fine-tuned variants and large language models, and find that fine-tuned models consistently outperform zero-shot baselines, demonstrating the need for task-specific adaptation. Our contributions include the introduction of this task and the release of a multilingual dataset to the research community.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FairGLVQ: Fairness in Partition-Based Classification
Citation-Based Summarization of Landmark Judgments
Prospects for inconsistency detection using large language models and sheaves
Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human Agreement
Xiezhi: An Ever-Updating Benchmark for Holistic Domain Knowledge Evaluation
IndianBailJudgments-1200: A Multi-Attribute Dataset for Legal NLP on Indian Bail Orders
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.