Benchmarking Data Heterogeneity Evaluation Approaches for Personalized Federated Learning
원문 초록
There is growing research interest in measuring the statistical heterogeneity of clients' local datasets. Such measurements are used to estimate the suitability for collaborative training of personalized federated learning (PFL) models. Currently, these research endeavors are taking place in silos and there is a lack of a unified benchmark to provide a fair and convenient comparison among various approaches in common settings. We aim to bridge this important gap in this paper. The proposed benchmarking framework currently includes six representative approaches. Extensive experiments have been conducted to compare these approaches under five standard non-IID FL settings, providing much needed insights into which approaches are advantageous under which settings. The proposed framework offers useful guidance on the suitability of various data divergence measures in FL systems. It is beneficial for keeping related research activities on the right track in terms of: (1) designing PFL schemes, (2) selecting appropriate data heterogeneity evaluation approaches for specific FL application scenarios, and (3) addressing fairness issues in collaborative model training. The code is available at https://github.com/Xiaoni-61/DH-Benchmark.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FeDa4Fair: Client-Level Federated Datasets for Fairness Evaluation
Convergence-Privacy-Fairness Trade-Off in Personalized Federated Learning
FLsim: A Modular and Library-Agnostic Simulation Framework for Federated Learning
pFedMMA: Personalized Federated Fine-Tuning with Multi-Modal Adapter for Vision-Language Models
FedGA: A Fair Federated Learning Framework Based on the Gini Coefficient
Towards Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learning Under Imbalanced Covariate Shift
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.