ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents
원문 초록
Autonomous web agents solve complex browsing tasks, yet existing benchmarks measure only whether an agent finishes a task, ignoring whether it does so safely or in a way enterprises can trust. To integrate these agents into critical workflows, safety and trustworthiness (ST) are prerequisite conditions for adoption. We introduce \textbf{\textsc{ST-WebAgentBench}}, a configurable and easily extensible suite for evaluating web agent ST across realistic enterprise scenarios. Each of its 222 tasks is paired with ST policies, concise rules that encode constraints, and is scored along six orthogonal dimensions (e.g., user consent, robustness). Beyond raw task success, we propose the \textit{Completion Under Policy} (\textit{CuP}) metric, which credits only completions that respect all applicable policies, and the \textit{Risk Ratio}, which quantifies ST breaches across dimensions. Evaluating three open state-of-the-art agents reveals that their average CuP is less than two-thirds of their nominal completion rate, exposing critical safety gaps. By releasing code, evaluation templates, and a policy-authoring interface, \href{https://sites.google.com/view/st-webagentbench/home}{\textsc{ST-WebAgentBench}} provides an actionable first step toward deploying trustworthy web agents at scale.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites
Magma: A Foundation Model for Multimodal AI Agents
Agent-E: From Autonomous Web Navigation to Foundational Design Principles in Agentic Systems
Context manipulation attacks : Web agents are susceptible to corrupted memory
WEPO: Web Element Preference Optimization for LLM-based Web Navigation
"What's important here?": Opportunities and Challenges of Using LLMs in Retrieving Information from Web Interfaces
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.