Can LLMs plan paths with extra hints from solvers?
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing, mathematical problem solving, and tasks related to program synthesis. However, their effectiveness in long-term planning and higher-order reasoning has been noted to be limited and fragile. This paper explores an approach for enhancing LLM performance in solving a classical robotic planning task by integrating solver-generated feedback. We explore four different strategies for providing feedback, including visual feedback, we utilize fine-tuning, and we evaluate the performance of three different LLMs across a 10 standard and 100 more randomly generated planning problems. Our results suggest that the solver-generated feedback improves the LLM's ability to solve the moderately difficult problems, but the harder problems still remain out of reach. The study provides detailed analysis of the effects of the different hinting strategies and the different planning tendencies of the evaluated LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
LocationReasoner: Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Site Selection Reasoning
SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
Solving Inequality Proofs with Large Language Models
Chain-of-Code Collapse: Reasoning Failures in LLMs via Adversarial Prompting in Code Generation
MORSE-500: A Programmatically Controllable Video Benchmark to Stress-Test Multimodal Reasoning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.