On the Rigour of Scientific Writing: Criteria, Analysis, and Insights
원문 초록
Rigour is crucial for scientific research as it ensures the reproducibility and validity of results and findings. Despite its importance, little work exists on modelling rigour computationally, and there is a lack of analysis on whether these criteria can effectively signal or measure the rigour of scientific papers in practice. In this paper, we introduce a bottom-up, data-driven framework to automatically identify and define rigour criteria and assess their relevance in scientific writing. Our framework includes rigour keyword extraction, detailed rigour definition generation, and salient criteria identification. Furthermore, our framework is domain-agnostic and can be tailored to the evaluation of scientific rigour for different areas, accommodating the distinct salient criteria across fields. We conducted comprehensive experiments based on datasets collected from two high impact venues for Machine Learning and NLP (i.e., ICLR and ACL) to demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in modelling rigour. In addition, we analyse linguistic patterns of rigour, revealing that framing certainty is crucial for enhancing the perception of scientific rigour, while suggestion certainty and probability uncertainty diminish it.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
PSCon: Product Search Through Conversations
SEKE: Specialised Experts for Keyword Extraction
LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Retrieval Augmented Generation
Robust Privacy Amidst Innovation with Large Language Models Through a Critical Assessment of the Risks
An Improved Method for Class-specific Keyword Extraction: A Case Study in the German Business Registry
AnyTaskTune: Advanced Domain-Specific Solutions through Task-Fine-Tuning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.