Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation
원문 초록
As AI advances in text generation, human trust in AI generated content remains constrained by biases that go beyond concerns of accuracy. This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. Through three experiments involving text rephrasing, news article summarization, and persuasive writing, we investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content. While the raters could not differentiate the two types of texts in the blind test, they overwhelmingly favored content labeled as "Human Generated," over those labeled "AI Generated," by a preference score of over 30%. We observed the same pattern even when the labels were deliberately swapped. This human bias against AI has broader societal and cognitive implications, as it undervalues AI performance. This study highlights the limitations of human judgment in interacting with AI and offers a foundation for improving human-AI collaboration, especially in creative fields.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
The Devil behind the mask: An emergent safety vulnerability of Diffusion LLMs
Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking
Seq vs Seq: An Open Suite of Paired Encoders and Decoders
OpenFActScore: Open-Source Atomic Evaluation of Factuality in Text Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.