Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) could struggle to fully understand legal theories and perform complex legal reasoning tasks. In this study, we introduce a challenging task (confusing charge prediction) to better evaluate LLMs' understanding of legal theories and reasoning capabilities. We also propose a novel framework: Multi-Agent framework for improving complex Legal Reasoning capability (MALR). MALR employs non-parametric learning, encouraging LLMs to automatically decompose complex legal tasks and mimic human learning process to extract insights from legal rules, helping LLMs better understand legal theories and enhance their legal reasoning abilities. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively addresses complex reasoning issues in practical scenarios, paving the way for more reliable applications in the legal domain.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Can ChatGPT Perform Reasoning Using the IRAC Method in Analyzing Legal Scenarios Like a Lawyer?
LLM-based HSE Compliance Assessment: Benchmark, Performance, and Advancements
Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use
CaseGen: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Legal Case Documents Generation
JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning
NitiBench: A Comprehensive Studies of LLM Frameworks Capabilities for Thai Legal Question Answering
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.