"Why" Has the Least Side Effect on Model Editing
원문 초록
Training large language models (LLMs) from scratch is an expensive endeavor, particularly as world knowledge continually evolves. To maintain relevance and accuracy of LLMs, model editing has emerged as a pivotal research area. While these methods hold promise, they can also produce unintended side effects. Their underlying factors and causes remain largely unexplored. This paper delves into a critical factor-question type-by categorizing model editing questions. Our findings reveal that the extent of performance degradation varies significantly across different question types, providing new insights for experimental design in knowledge editing. Furthermore, we investigate whether insights from smaller models can be extrapolated to larger models. Our results indicate discrepancies in findings between models of different sizes, suggesting that insights from smaller models may not necessarily apply to larger models. Additionally, we examine the impact of batch size on side effects, discovering that increasing the batch size can mitigate performance drops.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
UniErase: Unlearning Token as a Universal Erasure Primitive for Language Models
Knowledge Editing through Chain-of-Thought
REACT: Representation Extraction And Controllable Tuning to Overcome Overfitting in LLM Knowledge Editing
Disentangling Knowledge Representations for Large Language Model Editing
Editing Across Languages: A Survey of Multilingual Knowledge Editing
UniEdit: A Unified Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.