(Un)certainty of (Un)fairness: Preference-Based Selection of Certainly Fair Decision-Makers
원문 초록
Fairness metrics are used to assess discrimination and bias in decision-making processes across various domains, including machine learning models and human decision-makers in real-world applications. This involves calculating the disparities between probabilistic outcomes among social groups, such as acceptance rates between male and female applicants. However, traditional fairness metrics do not account for the uncertainty in these processes and lack of comparability when two decision-makers exhibit the same disparity. Using Bayesian statistics, we quantify the uncertainty of the disparity to enhance discrimination assessments. We represent each decision-maker, whether a machine learning model or a human, by its disparity and the corresponding uncertainty in that disparity. We define preferences over decision-makers and utilize brute-force to choose the optimal decision-maker according to a utility function that ranks decision-makers based on these preferences. The decision-maker with the highest utility score can be interpreted as the one for whom we are most certain that it is fair.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
One Size Fits None: Rethinking Fairness in Medical AI
Towards Responsible AI: Advances in Safety, Fairness, and Accountability of Autonomous Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.