A logical alarm for misaligned binary classifiers
원문 초록
If two agents disagree in their decisions, we may suspect they are not both correct. This intuition is formalized for evaluating agents that have carried out a binary classification task. Their agreements and disagreements on a joint test allow us to establish the only group evaluations logically consistent with their responses. This is done by establishing a set of axioms (algebraic relations) that must be universally obeyed by all evaluations of binary responders. A complete set of such axioms are possible for each ensemble of size N. The axioms for $N = 1, 2$ are used to construct a fully logical alarm - one that can prove that at least one ensemble member is malfunctioning using only unlabeled data. The similarities of this approach to formal software verification and its utility for recent agendas of safe guaranteed AI are discussed.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Inverse Scene Text Removal
EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements
PatchDEMUX: A Certifiably Robust Framework for Multi-label Classifiers Against Adversarial Patches
LGAR: Zero-Shot LLM-Guided Neural Ranking for Abstract Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews
Rhapsody: A Dataset for Highlight Detection in Podcasts
Token-level Accept or Reject: A Micro Alignment Approach for Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.