What Is Wrong with My Model? Identifying Systematic Problems with Semantic Data Slicing
원문 초록
Machine learning models make mistakes, yet sometimes it is difficult to identify the systematic problems behind the mistakes. Practitioners engage in various activities, including error analysis, testing, auditing, and red-teaming, to form hypotheses of what can go (or has gone) wrong with their models. To validate these hypotheses, practitioners employ data slicing to identify relevant examples. However, traditional data slicing is limited by available features and programmatic slicing functions. In this work, we propose SemSlicer, a framework that supports semantic data slicing, which identifies a semantically coherent slice, without the need for existing features. SemSlicer uses Large Language Models to annotate datasets and generate slices from any user-defined slicing criteria. We show that SemSlicer generates accurate slices with low cost, allows flexible trade-offs between different design dimensions, reliably identifies under-performing data slices, and helps practitioners identify useful data slices that reflect systematic problems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RabakBench: Scaling Human Annotations to Construct Localized Multilingual Safety Benchmarks for Low-Resource Languages
We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems
RedRFT: A Light-Weight Benchmark for Reinforcement Fine-Tuning-Based Red Teaming
RedDebate: Safer Responses through Multi-Agent Red Teaming Debates
BitBypass: A New Direction in Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models with Bitstream Camouflage
TRIDENT: Enhancing Large Language Model Safety with Tri-Dimensional Diversified Red-Teaming Data Synthesis
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.