What makes a good concept anyway ?
원문 초록
A good medical ontology is expected to cover its domain completely and correctly. On the other hand, large ontologies are hard to build, hard to understand, and hard to maintain. Thus, adding new concepts (often multi-word concepts) to an existing ontology must be done judiciously. Only "good" concepts should be added; however, it is difficult to define what makes a concept good. In this research, we propose a metric to measure the goodness of a concept. We identified factors that appear to influence goodness judgments of medical experts and combined them into a single metric. These factors include concept name length (in words), concept occurrence frequency in the medical literature, and syntactic categories of component words. As an added factor, we used the simplicity of a term after mapping it into a specific foreign language. We performed Bayesian optimization of factor weights to achieve maximum agreement between the metric and three medical experts. The results showed that our metric had a 50.67% overall agreement with the experts, as measured by Krippendorff's alpha.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization
Reinforcement Learning Increases Wind Farm Power Production by Enabling Closed-Loop Collaborative Control
Fast Bayesian Optimization of Function Networks with Partial Evaluations
Amortized variational transdimensional inference
VirnyFlow: A Design Space for Responsible Model Development
Bridging Quantum and Classical Computing in Drug Design: Architecture Principles for Improved Molecule Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.