LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This
원문 초록
As Large Language Models become more ubiquitous across domains, it becomes important to examine their inherent limitations critically. This work argues that hallucinations in language models are not just occasional errors but an inevitable feature of these systems. We demonstrate that hallucinations stem from the fundamental mathematical and logical structure of LLMs. It is, therefore, impossible to eliminate them through architectural improvements, dataset enhancements, or fact-checking mechanisms. Our analysis draws on computational theory and Godel's First Incompleteness Theorem, which references the undecidability of problems like the Halting, Emptiness, and Acceptance Problems. We demonstrate that every stage of the LLM process-from training data compilation to fact retrieval, intent classification, and text generation-will have a non-zero probability of producing hallucinations. This work introduces the concept of Structural Hallucination as an intrinsic nature of these systems. By establishing the mathematical certainty of hallucinations, we challenge the prevailing notion that they can be fully mitigated.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
Mitigating Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models via Dynamic Logits Calibration
Revisit What You See: Disclose Language Prior in Vision Tokens for Efficient Guided Decoding of LVLMs
Leveraging GANs for citation intent classification and its impact on citation network analysis
MultiHal: Multilingual Dataset for Knowledge-Graph Grounded Evaluation of LLM Hallucinations
The Future is Agentic: Definitions, Perspectives, and Open Challenges of Multi-Agent Recommender Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.