Revisiting Safe Exploration in Safe Reinforcement learning
원문 초록
Safe reinforcement learning (SafeRL) extends standard reinforcement learning with the idea of safety, where safety is typically defined through the constraint of the expected cost return of a trajectory being below a set limit. However, this metric fails to distinguish how costs accrue, treating infrequent severe cost events as equal to frequent mild ones, which can lead to riskier behaviors and result in unsafe exploration. We introduce a new metric, expected maximum consecutive cost steps (EMCC), which addresses safety during training by assessing the severity of unsafe steps based on their consecutive occurrence. This metric is particularly effective for distinguishing between prolonged and occasional safety violations. We apply EMMC in both on- and off-policy algorithm for benchmarking their safe exploration capability. Finally, we validate our metric through a set of benchmarks and propose a new lightweight benchmark task, which allows fast evaluation for algorithm design.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
High-Throughput Distributed Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Policy Synchronization
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
Exploring the robustness of TractOracle methods in RL-based tractography
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Gradient Eligibility Traces
AutoTriton: Automatic Triton Programming with Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.