Does Alignment Tuning Really Break LLMs' Internal Confidence?
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress, but their real-world application necessitates reliable calibration. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of calibration degradation of LLMs across four dimensions: models, calibration metrics, tasks, and confidence extraction methods. Initial analysis showed that the relationship between alignment and calibration is not always a trade-off, but under stricter analysis conditions, we found the alignment process consistently harms calibration. This highlights the need for (1) a careful approach when measuring model confidences and calibration errors and (2) future research into algorithms that can help LLMs to achieve both instruction-following and calibration without sacrificing either.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering
Meta SecAlign: A Secure Foundation LLM Against Prompt Injection Attacks
DeSTA2.5-Audio: Toward General-Purpose Large Audio Language Model with Self-Generated Cross-Modal Alignment
Kwai Keye-VL Technical Report
LLaVA-Pose: Enhancing Human Pose and Action Understanding via Keypoint-Integrated Instruction Tuning
InstructTTSEval: Benchmarking Complex Natural-Language Instruction Following in Text-to-Speech Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.