Examination of Code generated by Large Language Models
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and Copilot, are transforming software development by automating code generation and, arguably, enable rapid prototyping, support education, and boost productivity. Therefore, correctness and quality of the generated code should be on par with manually written code. To assess the current state of LLMs in generating correct code of high quality, we conducted controlled experiments with ChatGPT and Copilot: we let the LLMs generate simple algorithms in Java and Python along with the corresponding unit tests and assessed the correctness and the quality (coverage) of the generated (test) codes. We observed significant differences between the LLMs, between the languages, between algorithm and test codes, and over time. The present paper reports these results together with the experimental methods allowing repeated and comparable assessments for more algorithms, languages, and LLMs over time.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Devil behind the mask: An emergent safety vulnerability of Diffusion LLMs
Kodezi Chronos: A Debugging-First Language Model for Repository-Scale, Memory-Driven Code Understanding
Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
CoreCodeBench: A Configurable Multi-Scenario Repository-Level Benchmark
Estimating Correctness Without Oracles in LLM-Based Code Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.