Benchmarking Counterfactual Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Time Series Classification
원문 초록
The popularity of deep learning methods in the time series domain boosts interest in interpretability studies, including counterfactual (CF) methods. CF methods identify minimal changes in instances to alter the model predictions. Despite extensive research, no existing work benchmarks CF methods in the time series domain. Additionally, the results reported in the literature are inconclusive due to the limited number of datasets and inadequate metrics. In this work, we redesign quantitative metrics to accurately capture desirable characteristics in CFs. We specifically redesign the metrics for sparsity and plausibility and introduce a new metric for consistency. Combined with validity, generation time, and proximity, we form a comprehensive metric set. We systematically benchmark 6 different CF methods on 20 univariate datasets and 10 multivariate datasets with 3 different classifiers. Results indicate that the performance of CF methods varies across metrics and among different models. Finally, we provide case studies and a guideline for practical usage.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Learning Time Series Counterfactuals via Latent Space Representations
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Benchmarking Unsupervised Strategies for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods
TimeMaster: Training Time-Series Multimodal LLMs to Reason via Reinforcement Learning
STACT-Time: Spatio-Temporal Cross Attention for Cine Thyroid Ultrasound Time Series Classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.