Can GPT-4 Models Detect Misleading Visualizations?
원문 초록
The proliferation of misleading visualizations online, particularly during critical events like public health crises and elections, poses a significant risk. This study investigates the capability of GPT-4 models (4V, 4o, and 4o mini) to detect misleading visualizations. Utilizing a dataset of tweet-visualization pairs containing various visual misleaders, we test these models under four experimental conditions with different levels of guidance. We show that GPT-4 models can detect misleading visualizations with moderate accuracy without prior training (naive zero-shot) and that performance notably improves when provided with definitions of misleaders (guided zero-shot). However, a single prompt engineering technique does not yield the best results for all misleader types. Specifically, providing the models with misleader definitions and examples (guided few-shot) proves more effective for reasoning misleaders, while guided zero-shot performs better for design misleaders. This study underscores the feasibility of using large vision-language models to detect visual misinformation and the importance of prompt engineering for optimized detection accuracy.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Remember Past, Anticipate Future: Learning Continual Multimodal Misinformation Detectors
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Fine-Tuning and Prompt Engineering of LLMs, for the Creation of Multi-Agent AI for Addressing Sustainable Protein Production Challenges
Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated Reasoning
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
Time Series Forecasting as Reasoning: A Slow-Thinking Approach with Reinforced LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.