Area under the ROC Curve has the Most Consistent Evaluation for Binary Classification
원문 초록
The proper use of model evaluation metrics is important for model evaluation and model selection in binary classification tasks. This study investigates how consistent different metrics are at evaluating models across data of different prevalence while the relationships between different variables and the sample size are kept constant. Analyzing 156 data scenarios, 18 model evaluation metrics and five commonly used machine learning models as well as a naive random guess model, I find that evaluation metrics that are less influenced by prevalence offer more consistent evaluation of individual models and more consistent ranking of a set of models. In particular, Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) which takes all decision thresholds into account when evaluating models has the smallest variance in evaluating individual models and smallest variance in ranking of a set of models. A close threshold analysis using all possible thresholds for all metrics further supports the hypothesis that considering all decision thresholds helps reduce the variance in model evaluation with respect to prevalence change in data. The results have significant implications for model evaluation and model selection in binary classification tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
PatchDEMUX: A Certifiably Robust Framework for Multi-label Classifiers Against Adversarial Patches
Detecting immune cells with label-free two-photon autofluorescence and deep learning
Adversarial Surrogate Risk Bounds for Binary Classification
Hidden Persuasion: Detecting Manipulative Narratives on Social Media During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine
Attention to Patterns is all you need for Insider threat detection
LLSF - Learning Label Specific Features for Multi-Label Classifcation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.