No Such Thing as a General Learner: Language models and their dual optimization
원문 초록
What role can the otherwise successful Large Language Models (LLMs) play in the understanding of human cognition, and in particular in terms of informing language acquisition debates? To contribute to this question, we first argue that neither humans nor LLMs are general learners, in a variety of senses. We make a novel case for how in particular LLMs follow a dual-optimization process: they are optimized during their training (which is typically compared to language acquisition), and modern LLMs have also been selected, through a process akin to natural selection in a species. From this perspective, we argue that the performance of LLMs, whether similar or dissimilar to that of humans, does not weigh easily on important debates about the importance of human cognitive biases for language.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Aligning Sentence Simplification with ESL Learner's Proficiency for Language Acquisition
Grammar Control in Dialogue Response Generation for Language Learning Chatbots
ZhoBLiMP: a Systematic Assessment of Language Models with Linguistic Minimal Pairs in Chinese
Less is More: Pre-Training Cross-Lingual Small-Scale Language Models with Cognitively-Plausible Curriculum Learning Strategies
From Babble to Words: Pre-Training Language Models on Continuous Streams of Phonemes
Generalizations across filler-gap dependencies in neural language models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.