Measuring Agreeableness Bias in Multimodal Models
원문 초록
This paper examines a phenomenon in multimodal language models where pre-marked options in question images can significantly influence model responses. Our study employs a systematic methodology to investigate this effect: we present models with images of multiple-choice questions, which they initially answer correctly, then expose the same model to versions with pre-marked options. Our findings reveal a significant shift in the models' responses towards the pre-marked option, even when it contradicts their answers in the neutral settings. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that this agreeableness bias is a consistent and quantifiable behavior across various model architectures. These results show potential limitations in the reliability of these models when processing images with pre-marked options, raising important questions about their application in critical decision-making contexts where such visual cues might be present.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Hypothesis Testing for Quantifying LLM-Human Misalignment in Multiple Choice Settings
Graph-Structured Data Analysis of Component Failure in Autonomous Cargo Ships Based on Feature Fusion
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
InvestAlign: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Aligning Large Language Models with Investor Decision-Making Processes under Herd Behavior
VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systems
Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Causal Influence Prompting
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.