Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods
원문 초록
Exploring the capabilities of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Gaussian-based methods in the context of 3D scene reconstruction, this study contrasts these modern approaches with traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems. Utilizing datasets such as Replica and ScanNet, we assess performance based on tracking accuracy, mapping fidelity, and view synthesis. Findings reveal that NeRF excels in view synthesis, offering unique capabilities in generating new perspectives from existing data, albeit at slower processing speeds. Conversely, Gaussian-based methods provide rapid processing and significant expressiveness but lack comprehensive scene completion. Enhanced by global optimization and loop closure techniques, newer methods like NICE-SLAM and SplaTAM not only surpass older frameworks such as ORB-SLAM2 in terms of robustness but also demonstrate superior performance in dynamic and complex environments. This comparative analysis bridges theoretical research with practical implications, shedding light on future developments in robust 3D scene reconstruction across various real-world applications.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
NeRF-based CBCT Reconstruction needs Normalization and Initialization
R3eVision: A Survey on Robust Rendering, Restoration, and Enhancement for 3D Low-Level Vision
SLAM&Render: A Benchmark for the Intersection Between Neural Rendering, Gaussian Splatting and SLAM
SPC to 3D: Novel View Synthesis from Binary SPC via I2I translation
Dy3DGS-SLAM: Monocular 3D Gaussian Splatting SLAM for Dynamic Environments
ADD-SLAM: Adaptive Dynamic Dense SLAM with Gaussian Splatting
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.