A Logical Fallacy-Informed Framework for Argument Generation
원문 초록
Despite the remarkable performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in natural language processing tasks, they still struggle with generating logically sound arguments, resulting in potential risks such as spreading misinformation. To address this issue, we introduce FIPO, a fallacy-informed framework that leverages preference optimization methods to steer LLMs toward logically sound arguments. FIPO includes a classification loss, to capture the fine-grained information on fallacy types. Our results on argumentation datasets show that our method reduces the fallacy errors by up to 17.5%. Furthermore, our human evaluation results indicate that the quality of the generated arguments by our method significantly outperforms the fine-tuned baselines, as well as other preference optimization methods, such as DPO. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring models are aware of logical fallacies for effective argument generation. Our code is available at github.com/lucamouchel/Logical-Fallacies.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SLURG: Investigating the Feasibility of Generating Synthetic Online Fallacious Discourse
Leveraging Context for Multimodal Fallacy Classification in Political Debates
Remember Past, Anticipate Future: Learning Continual Multimodal Misinformation Detectors
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated Reasoning
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.