Artifical intelligence and inherent mathematical difficulty
원문 초록
This paper explores the relationship of artificial intelligence to the task of resolving open questions in mathematics. We first present an updated version of a traditional argument that limitative results from computability and complexity theory show that proof discovery is an inherently difficult problem. We then illustrate how several recent applications of artificial intelligence-inspired methods -- respectively involving automated theorem proving, SAT-solvers, and large language models -- do indeed raise novel questions about the nature of mathematical proof. We also argue that the results obtained by such techniques do not tell against our basic argument. This is so because they are embodiments of brute force search and are thus capable of deciding only statements of low logical complexity.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification
LeanExplore: A search engine for Lean 4 declarations
Autoformalization in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey
DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learning
Enumerate-Conjecture-Prove: Formally Solving Answer-Construction Problems in Math Competitions
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.