ExoViP: Step-by-step Verification and Exploration with Exoskeleton Modules for Compositional Visual Reasoning
원문 초록
Compositional visual reasoning methods, which translate a complex query into a structured composition of feasible visual tasks, have exhibited a strong potential in complicated multi-modal tasks. Empowered by recent advances in large language models (LLMs), this multi-modal challenge has been brought to a new stage by treating LLMs as few-shot/zero-shot planners, i.e., vision-language (VL) programming. Such methods, despite their numerous merits, suffer from challenges due to LLM planning mistakes or inaccuracy of visual execution modules, lagging behind the non-compositional models. In this work, we devise a "plug-and-play" method, ExoViP, to correct errors in both the planning and execution stages through introspective verification. We employ verification modules as "exoskeletons" to enhance current VL programming schemes. Specifically, our proposed verification module utilizes a mixture of three sub-verifiers to validate predictions after each reasoning step, subsequently calibrating the visual module predictions and refining the reasoning trace planned by LLMs. Experimental results on two representative VL programming methods showcase consistent improvements on five compositional reasoning tasks on standard benchmarks. In light of this, we believe that ExoViP can foster better performance and generalization on open-domain multi-modal challenges.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Beyond Task-Specific Reasoning: A Unified Conditional Generative Framework for Abstract Visual Reasoning
Orchestrator-Agent Trust: A Modular Agentic AI Visual Classification System with Trust-Aware Orchestration and RAG-Based Reasoning
High-Resolution Visual Reasoning via Multi-Turn Grounding-Based Reinforcement Learning
Skywork-R1V3 Technical Report
Machine Mental Imagery: Empower Multimodal Reasoning with Latent Visual Tokens
Vision Matters: Simple Visual Perturbations Can Boost Multimodal Math Reasoning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.