Compressed models are NOT miniature versions of large models
원문 초록
Large neural models are often compressed before deployment. Model compression is necessary for many practical reasons, such as inference latency, memory footprint, and energy consumption. Compressed models are assumed to be miniature versions of corresponding large neural models. However, we question this belief in our work. We compare compressed models with corresponding large neural models using four model characteristics: prediction errors, data representation, data distribution, and vulnerability to adversarial attack. We perform experiments using the BERT-large model and its five compressed versions. For all four model characteristics, compressed models significantly differ from the BERT-large model. Even among compressed models, they differ from each other on all four model characteristics. Apart from the expected loss in model performance, there are major side effects of using compressed models to replace large neural models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
VIP: Visual Information Protection through Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language Models
Identifying the Smallest Adversarial Load Perturbations that Render DC-OPF Infeasible
ScoreAdv: Score-based Targeted Generation of Natural Adversarial Examples via Diffusion Models
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Adversarial Attacks and Detection in Visual Place Recognition for Safer Robot Navigation
Simple is what you need for efficient and accurate medical image segmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.