arXiv:2407.05733
Is GPT-4 Alone Sufficient for Automated Essay Scoring?: A Comparative Judgment Approach Based on Rater Cognition
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in Automated Essay Scoring (AES), but their zero-shot and few-shot performance often falls short compared to state-of-the-art models and human raters. However, fine-tuning LLMs for each specific task is impractical due to the variety of essay prompts and rubrics used in real-world educational contexts. This study proposes a novel approach combining LLMs and Comparative Judgment (CJ) for AES, using zero-shot prompting to choose between two essays. We demonstrate that a CJ method surpasses traditional rubric-based scoring in essay scoring using LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Beyond Agreement: Diagnosing the Rationale Alignment of Automated Essay Scoring Methods based on Linguistically-informed Counterfactuals
Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation
Autoregressive Score Generation for Multi-trait Essay Scoring
Can Large Language Models Automatically Score Proficiency of Written Essays?
VerAs: Verify then Assess STEM Lab Reports
Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.