Question-Analysis Prompting Improves LLM Performance in Reasoning Tasks
원문 초록
Although LLMs have the potential to transform many fields, they still underperform humans in reasoning tasks. Existing methods induce the model to produce step-by-step calculations, but this research explores the question: Does making the LLM analyze the question improve its performance? We propose a novel prompting strategy called Question Analysis Prompting (QAP), in which the model is prompted to explain the question in $n$ words before solving. The value of $n$ influences the length of response generated by the model. QAP is evaluated on GPT 3.5 Turbo and GPT 4 Turbo on arithmetic datasets GSM8K, AQuA, and SAT and commonsense dataset StrategyQA. QAP is compared with other state-of-the-art prompts including Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Plan and Solve Prompting (PS+) and Take A Deep Breath (TADB). QAP outperforms all state-of-the-art prompts on AQuA and SAT datasets on both GPT3.5 and GPT4. QAP consistently ranks among the top-2 prompts on 75\% of the tests. A key factor of QAP performance can be attributed to response length, where detailed responses are beneficial when answering harder questions, but can negatively affect easy questions.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DeLTa: A Decoding Strategy based on Logit Trajectory Prediction Improves Factuality and Reasoning Ability
Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solvers
Unchosen Experts Can Contribute Too: Unleashing MoE Models' Power by Self-Contrast
Rule-Guided Feedback: Enhancing Reasoning by Enforcing Rule Adherence in Large Language Models
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Approach to LLM Prompting
Advancing Process Verification for Large Language Models via Tree-Based Preference Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.