Position: Benchmarking is Limited in Reinforcement Learning Research
원문 초록
Novel reinforcement learning algorithms, or improvements on existing ones, are commonly justified by evaluating their performance on benchmark environments and are compared to an ever-changing set of standard algorithms. However, despite numerous calls for improvements, experimental practices continue to produce misleading or unsupported claims. One reason for the ongoing substandard practices is that conducting rigorous benchmarking experiments requires substantial computational time. This work investigates the sources of increased computation costs in rigorous experiment designs. We show that conducting rigorous performance benchmarks will likely have computational costs that are often prohibitive. As a result, we argue for using an additional experimentation paradigm to overcome the limitations of benchmarking.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
High-Throughput Distributed Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Policy Synchronization
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
Exploring the robustness of TractOracle methods in RL-based tractography
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Gradient Eligibility Traces
AutoTriton: Automatic Triton Programming with Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.