Evidence of a log scaling law for political persuasion with large language models
원문 초록
Large language models can now generate political messages as persuasive as those written by humans, raising concerns about how far this persuasiveness may continue to increase with model size. Here, we generate 720 persuasive messages on 10 U.S. political issues from 24 language models spanning several orders of magnitude in size. We then deploy these messages in a large-scale randomized survey experiment (N = 25,982) to estimate the persuasive capability of each model. Our findings are twofold. First, we find evidence of a log scaling law: model persuasiveness is characterized by sharply diminishing returns, such that current frontier models are barely more persuasive than models smaller in size by an order of magnitude or more. Second, mere task completion (coherence, staying on topic) appears to account for larger models' persuasive advantage. These findings suggest that further scaling model size will not much increase the persuasiveness of static LLM-generated messages.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Must Read: A Systematic Survey of Computational Persuasion
Labeling Messages as AI-Generated Does Not Reduce Their Persuasive Effects
Tailored Truths: Optimizing LLM Persuasion with Personalization and Fabricated Statistics
CAP: Evaluation of Persuasive and Creative Image Generation
Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voters
I Want to Break Free! Persuasion and Anti-Social Behavior of LLMs in Multi-Agent Settings with Social Hierarchy
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.