More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play
원문 초록
The boardgame Diplomacy is a challenging setting for communicative and cooperative artificial intelligence. The most prominent communicative Diplomacy AI, Cicero, has excellent strategic abilities, exceeding human players. However, the best Diplomacy players master communication, not just tactics, which is why the game has received attention as an AI challenge. This work seeks to understand the degree to which Cicero succeeds at communication. First, we annotate in-game communication with abstract meaning representation to separate in-game tactics from general language. Second, we run two dozen games with humans and Cicero, totaling over 200 human-player hours of competition. While AI can consistently outplay human players, AI-Human communication is still limited because of AI's difficulty with deception and persuasion. This shows that Cicero relies on strategy and has not yet reached the full promise of communicative and cooperative AI.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Abstract Meaning Representation for Hospital Discharge Summarization
Reassessing Graph Linearization for Sequence-to-sequence AMR Parsing: On the Advantages and Limitations of Triple-Based Encoding
Generating Text from Uniform Meaning Representation
Human-Robot Dialogue Annotation for Multi-Modal Common Ground
SCOUT: A Situated and Multi-Modal Human-Robot Dialogue Corpus
A graph-based approach to extracting narrative signals from public discourse
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.