Why Would You Suggest That? Human Trust in Language Model Responses
원문 초록
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revealed a growing need for human-AI collaboration, especially in creative decision-making scenarios where trust and reliance are paramount. Through human studies and model evaluations on the open-ended News Headline Generation task from the LaMP benchmark, we analyze how the framing and presence of explanations affect user trust and model performance. Overall, we provide evidence that adding an explanation in the model response to justify its reasoning significantly increases self-reported user trust in the model when the user has the opportunity to compare various responses. Position and faithfulness of these explanations are also important factors. However, these gains disappear when users are shown responses independently, suggesting that humans trust all model responses, including deceptive ones, equitably when they are shown in isolation. Our findings urge future research to delve deeper into the nuanced evaluation of trust in human-machine teaming systems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Inaugural MOASEI Competition at AAMAS'2025: A Technical Report
Case-based Reasoning Augmented Large Language Model Framework for Decision Making in Realistic Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
Make Your AUV Adaptive: An Environment-Aware Reinforcement Learning Framework For Underwater Tasks
Hypothesis Testing for Quantifying LLM-Human Misalignment in Multiple Choice Settings
CFBenchmark-MM: Chinese Financial Assistant Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model
HOP+: History-enhanced and Order-aware Pre-training for Vision-and-Language Navigation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.