Do Vision-Language Transformers Exhibit Visual Commonsense? An Empirical Study of VCR
원문 초록
Visual Commonsense Reasoning (VCR) calls for explanatory reasoning behind question answering over visual scenes. To achieve this goal, a model is required to provide an acceptable rationale as the reason for the predicted answers. Progress on the benchmark dataset stems largely from the recent advancement of Vision-Language Transformers (VL Transformers). These models are first pre-trained on some generic large-scale vision-text datasets, and then the learned representations are transferred to the downstream VCR task. Despite their attractive performance, this paper posits that the VL Transformers do not exhibit visual commonsense, which is the key to VCR. In particular, our empirical results pinpoint several shortcomings of existing VL Transformers: small gains from pre-training, unexpected language bias, limited model architecture for the two inseparable sub-tasks, and neglect of the important object-tag correlation. With these findings, we tentatively suggest some future directions from the aspect of dataset, evaluation metric, and training tricks. We believe this work could make researchers revisit the intuition and goals of VCR, and thus help tackle the remaining challenges in visual reasoning.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Multi-Step Visual Reasoning with Visual Tokens Scaling and Verification
Understand, Think, and Answer: Advancing Visual Reasoning with Large Multimodal Models
MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning
ChartReasoner: Code-Driven Modality Bridging for Long-Chain Reasoning in Chart Question Answering
Hallucination at a Glance: Controlled Visual Edits and Fine-Grained Multimodal Learning
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.