Squeezing Lemons with Hammers: An Evaluation of AutoML and Tabular Deep Learning for Data-Scarce Classification Applications
원문 초록
Many industry verticals are confronted with small-sized tabular data. In this low-data regime, it is currently unclear whether the best performance can be expected from simple baselines, or more complex machine learning approaches that leverage meta-learning and ensembling. On 44 tabular classification datasets with sample sizes $\leq$ 500, we find that L2-regularized logistic regression performs similar to state-of-the-art automated machine learning (AutoML) frameworks (AutoPrognosis, AutoGluon) and off-the-shelf deep neural networks (TabPFN, HyperFast) on the majority of the benchmark datasets. We therefore recommend to consider logistic regression as the first choice for data-scarce applications with tabular data and provide practitioners with best practices for further method selection.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation
Learning Interpretable Differentiable Logic Networks for Tabular Regression
Geo-ORBIT: A Federated Digital Twin Framework for Scene-Adaptive Lane Geometry Detection
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
Vector Contrastive Learning For Pixel-Wise Pretraining In Medical Vision
Overtuning in Hyperparameter Optimization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.