Hire Me or Not? Examining Language Model's Behavior with Occupation Attributes
원문 초록
With the impressive performance in various downstream tasks, large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into production pipelines, like recruitment and recommendation systems. A known issue of models trained on natural language data is the presence of human biases, which can impact the fairness of the system. This paper investigates LLMs' behavior with respect to gender stereotypes, in the context of occupation decision making. Our framework is designed to investigate and quantify the presence of gender stereotypes in LLMs' behavior via multi-round question answering. Inspired by prior works, we construct a dataset by leveraging a standard occupation classification knowledge base released by authoritative agencies. We tested three LLMs (RoBERTa-large, GPT-3.5-turbo, and Llama2-70b-chat) and found that all models exhibit gender stereotypes analogous to human biases, but with different preferences. The distinct preferences of GPT-3.5-turbo and Llama2-70b-chat may imply the current alignment methods are insufficient for debiasing and could introduce new biases contradicting the traditional gender stereotypes.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
UProp: Investigating the Uncertainty Propagation of LLMs in Multi-Step Agentic Decision-Making
Looking for Fairness in Recommender Systems
LLM-Stackelberg Games: Conjectural Reasoning Equilibria and Their Applications to Spearphishing
Graph Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.