Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: A Perspective From Polytope Theory
원문 초록
Counterfactual explanations provide ways of achieving a favorable model outcome with minimum input perturbation. However, counterfactual explanations can also be leveraged to reconstruct the model by strategically training a surrogate model to give similar predictions as the original (target) model. In this work, we analyze how model reconstruction using counterfactuals can be improved by further leveraging the fact that the counterfactuals also lie quite close to the decision boundary. Our main contribution is to derive novel theoretical relationships between the error in model reconstruction and the number of counterfactual queries required using polytope theory. Our theoretical analysis leads us to propose a strategy for model reconstruction that we call Counterfactual Clamping Attack (CCA) which trains a surrogate model using a unique loss function that treats counterfactuals differently than ordinary instances. Our approach also alleviates the related problem of decision boundary shift that arises in existing model reconstruction approaches when counterfactuals are treated as ordinary instances. Experimental results demonstrate that our strategy improves fidelity between the target and surrogate model predictions on several datasets.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
From Counterfactuals to Trees: Competitive Analysis of Model Extraction Attacks
On the interplay of Explainability, Privacy and Predictive Performance with Explanation-assisted Model Extraction
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
Generative Learner for Distributional Causal Effects
Transformer-Based Spatial-Temporal Counterfactual Outcomes Estimation
Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.