Can GPT-4 do L2 analytic assessment?
원문 초록
Automated essay scoring (AES) to evaluate second language (L2) proficiency has been a firmly established technology used in educational contexts for decades. Although holistic scoring has seen advancements in AES that match or even exceed human performance, analytic scoring still encounters issues as it inherits flaws and shortcomings from the human scoring process. The recent introduction of large language models presents new opportunities for automating the evaluation of specific aspects of L2 writing proficiency. In this paper, we perform a series of experiments using GPT-4 in a zero-shot fashion on a publicly available dataset annotated with holistic scores based on the Common European Framework of Reference and aim to extract detailed information about their underlying analytic components. We observe significant correlations between the automatically predicted analytic scores and multiple features associated with the individual proficiency components.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Beyond Agreement: Diagnosing the Rationale Alignment of Automated Essay Scoring Methods based on Linguistically-informed Counterfactuals
Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation
Autoregressive Score Generation for Multi-trait Essay Scoring
Can Large Language Models Automatically Score Proficiency of Written Essays?
VerAs: Verify then Assess STEM Lab Reports
Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.