Debiasing Machine Unlearning with Counterfactual Examples
원문 초록
The right to be forgotten (RTBF) seeks to safeguard individuals from the enduring effects of their historical actions by implementing machine-learning techniques. These techniques facilitate the deletion of previously acquired knowledge without requiring extensive model retraining. However, they often overlook a critical issue: unlearning processes bias. This bias emerges from two main sources: (1) data-level bias, characterized by uneven data removal, and (2) algorithm-level bias, which leads to the contamination of the remaining dataset, thereby degrading model accuracy. In this work, we analyze the causal factors behind the unlearning process and mitigate biases at both data and algorithmic levels. Typically, we introduce an intervention-based approach, where knowledge to forget is erased with a debiased dataset. Besides, we guide the forgetting procedure by leveraging counterfactual examples, as they maintain semantic data consistency without hurting performance on the remaining dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing machine unlearning baselines on evaluation metrics.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Soft Weighted Machine Unlearning
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
Generative Learner for Distributional Causal Effects
Model State Arithmetic for Machine Unlearning
Transformer-Based Spatial-Temporal Counterfactual Outcomes Estimation
Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.