Explaining Arguments' Strength: Unveiling the Role of Attacks and Supports (Technical Report)
원문 초록
Quantitatively explaining the strength of arguments under gradual semantics has recently received increasing attention. Specifically, several works in the literature provide quantitative explanations by computing the attribution scores of arguments. These works disregard the importance of attacks and supports, even though they play an essential role when explaining arguments' strength. In this paper, we propose a novel theory of Relation Attribution Explanations (RAEs), adapting Shapley values from game theory to offer fine-grained insights into the role of attacks and supports in quantitative bipolar argumentation towards obtaining the arguments' strength. We show that RAEs satisfy several desirable properties. We also propose a probabilistic algorithm to approximate RAEs efficiently. Finally, we show the application value of RAEs in fraud detection and large language models case studies.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements
GARG-AML against Smurfing: A Scalable and Interpretable Graph-Based Framework for Anti-Money Laundering
AD-AGENT: A Multi-agent Framework for End-to-end Anomaly Detection
Cyber Security Data Science: Machine Learning Methods and their Performance on Imbalanced Datasets
Federated Spectral Graph Transformers Meet Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Non-IID Graphs
FeatInsight: An Online ML Feature Management System on 4Paradigm Sage-Studio Platform
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.